United States v. Raymond
United States Court of Military Appeals
1DissentSullivan, Chief Judge
I respectfully dissent. I cannot join in the majority’s creation of an “accommodation theory” which beclouds the realities of military life behind a legal fiction. 38 MJ at 138.1 Whether a “personnel” regulation or a “law enforcement” regulation, Army Regulation (AR) 608-18, The Army Family Advocacy Program (September 18, 1987) establishes an agency relationship between Army social workers and military law enforcement authorities which cannot be gainsaid. Thus, I would hold that the military judge erred, as a matter of law, in overruling defense counsel’s objection to admission of Mr.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. McGranerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. PennUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.