Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Raymond

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 28, 1993No. 68,320; CMR No. 9102830Published

1DissentSullivan, Chief Judge

I respectfully dissent. I cannot join in the majority’s creation of an “accommodation theory” which beclouds the realities of military life behind a legal fiction. 38 MJ at 138.1 Whether a “personnel” regulation or a “law enforcement” regulation, Army Regulation (AR) 608-18, The Army Family Advocacy Program (September 18, 1987) establishes an agency relationship between Army social workers and military law enforcement authorities which cannot be gainsaid. Thus, I would hold that the military judge erred, as a matter of law, in overruling defense counsel’s objection to admission of Mr.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. United States v. McGranerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  5. United States v. PennUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API