Legal Opinion

Mayer v. Wiltberger

Chatham Superior Court, Ga.

Decided January 15, 1842Published

Motion for a New Trial, 1. The verdict of a Special Jury must be manifestly contrary to evidence and the principles of Justice, to justify the Court in granting a new trial^ In case of doubt, the Court will not interfere, especially after two concurrent verdicts. 2. The admission of an incompetent witness is not ground fot a new trial, where all the facts, testified to by him, arc proved by other testimony. 3. The devise of an absolute estate in foe may be qualified, by a…

Read the full summary

Motion for a New Trial, 1. The verdict of a Special Jury must be manifestly contrary to evidence and the principles of Justice, to justify the Court in granting a new trial^ In case of doubt, the Court will not interfere, especially after two concurrent verdicts. 2. The admission of an incompetent witness is not ground fot a new trial, where all the facts, testified to by him, arc proved by other testimony. 3. The devise of an absolute estate in foe may be qualified, by a subsequent limitation upon contingency, in the same will. 4. But if such contingent be an indefinite failure of issue: it…

1Opinion of the Court

On the trial of this cause before the Petit Jury, as also before the *21Special Jury, at the present term, verdicts were returned by each, in favor of the above named plaintiff, with costs of suit.

And now the defendant moves for a new trial, on the following grounds:

First: Because his Honor, the presiding Judge, erred, in admitting John Hover, to be sworn as a witness ; he being incompetent, by reason of his interest, as executor of the will, under which the plaintiff claimed.*

Second: Because, by and under the will of Cyrenus Mayer, the elder, the property, the subject of-dispute in the above…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Anderson v. JacksonNew York Supreme Court · 1819
  3. Thompson v. PeterSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  4. John Hagan, in Error v. Thomas J. FoisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1836

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API