Limestone County Department of Human Resources v. McAllister
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BEATTY, Justice.
This is a child dependency case. At the dependency hearing, the trial court excluded the testimony of two witnesses and held that the child was not dependent. The Court of Civil Appeals reversed and remanded, holding that the testimony of both witnesses had been improperly excluded, 541 So.2d 1099. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
On December 9, 1986, the Limestone County Department of Human Resources (“DHR”) filed a petition with the Juvenile Court of Limestone County seeking to have petitioner’s four-year-old daughter declared a dependent child because she had…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Alabama Farm Bureau Mut. v. City of HartselleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Ex Parte HolladaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Darks Dairy, Inc. v. Ala. Dairy Com'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Ex Parte BerryhillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Mann v. City of TallasseeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Price v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991