Legal Opinion
Di Tommaso v. Boeing Co.
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided November 29, 1995No. Civ. 95-1327(DRD)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOMINGUEZ, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is defendant’s, the Boeing Company (hereinafter referred to as “Boeing”), Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 6) and Plaintiffs Opposition thereto (Docket No. 15).
A stewardess of American Airlines filed the instant complaint for an accident she suffered when the jumpseat of the plane she was serving collapsed on landing in Puerto Rico. She has sued the manufacturer of the plane and the jumpseat.
I. Time Bar Allegations
The manufacturer of the plane, defendant Boeing, firstly, alleges that the complaint is time barred, because the accident object…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Carlos Pizarro, Etc. v. Hoteles Concorde International, C.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Industrial Siderúrgica, Inc. v. Thyssen Steel Caribbean, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1983
- Tropigas de Puerto Rico v. Tribunal SuperiorSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Palmer v. Radisson Hotel InternationalDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1999