Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Colposcope of America, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 14, 1975No. 74-467PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The only point presented on appeal in this case is whether or not the trial court erred by not directing a verdict in favor of the defendant-insurance company.

Appellant asserts that the undisputed evidence at trial established that the appel-lee’s medical equipment, which had been placed on display at a medical exhibition in New York, was stolen prior to the time it was picked up by the carrier, Exposition Drayage, Inc.

Therefore, appellant argues that as a matter of law its insurance policy did not cover the loss of five crates containing the equipment.

The terms of the policy covered only…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. UNDERWRITERS NAT. ASSUR. CO. v. HarrisonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  2. Klingshirn Corp. v. TurkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API