Legal Opinion
Hudson & Manhattan Railroad Company v. Stichman
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 9, 1956No. 23732_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
229 F.2d 616
In the Matter of HUDSON & MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY, Debtor in Proceedings for Reorganization pursuant to Chapter X of the Bankruptcy Act.
HUDSON & MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY, Debtor, Appellant,
v.
Herman T. STICHMAN, Trustee of the Debtor, et al., Appellee, and
William J. Harding, Jr., Irving I. Schnur and Shirley Reiter, Appellees.
No. 173.
Docket 23732.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued December 22, 1955.
Decided February 9, 1956.
Otis Mark Waters (Valente & Hallheimer, New York City, Julius Hallheimer, Louis A. Valente, New York City, of counsel on the brief) for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Seidel v. Palisades-On-The-DesplainesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- Dworsky v. Alanjay Bias Binding CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Moore v. LinahanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Snyder v. FennerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Caruso Enterprises, Inc. v. U. S. A. Motel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Motel Corporation v. Motel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- In the Matter of American National Trust and Republic National Trust, Debtors (Appellees) v. Neva M. Shanklin, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970