Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Taylor

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 3, 1988No. 86—0498Published

1DissentJustice McNAMARA

I respectfully dissent from the majority holding that the evidence failed to show the requisite force necessary to constitute robbery.

An act asserts sufficient force to constitute robbery where the property is so attached to the victim’s person as to create resistance to the taking. (People v. Patton (1979), 76 Ill. 2d 45, 389 N.E.2d 1174, citing Annot., 42 A.L.R.3d 1381 (1972); 2 R. Anderson, Wharton’s Criminal Law and Procedure §561 (1957); W. LaFave & A. Scott, Criminal Law 696-97 (1972).) Our supreme court, in stating the well-established rule in Patton, cited Rex v. Mason (1820), Russ. &…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BowelIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. People v. PattonIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. People v. CampbellIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  4. People v. RyanIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  5. People v. HuntingtonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API