Legal Opinion

Wallower's Estate

Pennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County

Decided May 22, 1925No. 20Published

1Opinion of the Court

Lamorelle, P. J.,

One claiming as surviving spouse of an intestate the $5000 preference given by section 2 of the Intestate Act of 1917 must show actual marriage or, in the alternative, such circumstances as in law raise a presumption of marriage: Wandall’s Estate, 29 Dist. R. 1132. Measured by this standard, the Auditing Judge finds that the claimant has not made out his case.

Notwithstanding the able argument of the exceptant, we are not convinced that this ruling should be reversed. Says Mr. Justice Fell, in Fur bush’s Estate, 220 Pa. 166 (at page 167): “Findings of fact will not be reversed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Steinmeyer v. SiebertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  2. Gongaware's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. In re Estate of ComlySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  4. Furbush's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API