Legal Opinion

Albrecht v. Flamisch

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County

Decided July 1, 1921No. 75Published

Assumpsit. Rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defence. C. P. Berks Co., March T., 1921, No. 75.

1Opinion of the CourtEndlich, P. J.

This is an action of assumpsit, in which the plaintiff’s statement avers that on Nov. 1,1919, the defendant ordered from the plaintiff verbally two certificates issued by the Neversink Distilling Co., Ltd., a corporation engaged in the business of distilling whiskey at Lorane, Berks County, for ten barrels of whiskey then in bond in the warehouse of said distilling company at Lorane, to be paid for at the rate of $4.50 per gallon; that the plaintiff duly accepted the order and delivered to the defendant two certificates, numbered 1424 and 1425, for ten barrels of whiskey, the one certificate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Allegheny v. Millville, Etna & Sharpsburg Street Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Gottman v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1878
  3. Knapp v. Duck Creek Valley Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API