Legal Opinion
ATS Mobile Telephone, Inc. v. Curtin Call Communications, Inc.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided July 31, 1975No. 39855PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, C. J.
This is an appeal by the defendants, Curtin Call Communications, Inc. (Curtin Call), and Ben and Mary Ciaccio, doing business as Telephone Secretaries of Omaha and Telephone Answering Service of Omaha, from a ruling by the Nebraska Public Service Commission sustaining a complaint filed by the complainant, ATS Mobile Telephone, Inc. (ATS). The Commission ordered Curtin Call to cease and desist from offering communication services to Nebraska customers without first receiving a certificate of public convenience and necessity from the Nebraska Public Service Commission. We affirm the judgment of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Head v. New Mexico Board of Examiners in OptometrySupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- TV Pix, Inc. v. TaylorDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1968
- TV Pix, Inc. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Williams v. Public Service CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- Vulcraft v. KarnesNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
- ATS Mobile Telephone, Inc. v. General Communications Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1979
- Appeal of WilliamsWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- Fields v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.