Legal Opinion · Dissent
Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Ass'n v. New Mexico Board of Pharmacy
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided July 25, 1974No. 1009Published
1DissentSutin, Judge
I respectfully dissent.
In Heyde v. State Securities, 63 N.M. 395, 399, 320 P.2d 747, 750 (1958) the court said:
In any case substantial justice requires that we lift the veil and take a peek.
First, on June 12, 1972, the New Mexico Board of Pharmacy gave notice to The Albuquerque Journal, a newspaper of general circulation in the State, that a public hearing would be held July 19, 1972. The notice stated that “The purpose of the hearing will be the consideration of proposed regulations and amendments to and revisions of existing regulations set forth below :”
‡ ‡ jfc ?}c >}c
Chapter 23, Laws of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Head v. New Mexico Board of Examiners in OptometrySupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bourjois, Inc. v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- City of Roswell v. New Mexico Water Quality Control CommissionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- State v. PateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.