Legal Opinion
McCollum v. Bahl
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided May 3, 2010No. 1:08-cr-00096Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GORDON J. QUIST, District Judge.
The [investigating officer] advised the incident happened between 8:30-8:45 a. [m]. From the above time chart, the suspect was visible on camera 7 during that time. Unless the times given to me by the [investigating officer] for the card swipe or the frames chosen by the [investigating officer] as in/out [were inaccurate] the suspect did not commit the crime.
In all likelihood, had the jury in the trial of Plaintiff, Claude Zain McCollum (“McCollum”), for the sexual assault and murder of Carolyn Kronenberg heard this statement or testimony from its…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.