Kennedy Tank & Mfg. Co., Inc., and Hemlock Semiconductor Corp., and Hemlock Semiconductor, LLC v. Emmert Industrial Corporation, d/b/a Emmert International
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
RILEY,
Judge concurring and dissenting.
[17] I concur with the majority’s determination that 49 U.S.C. § 14705(a) preempts the statute of limitations set forth in Indiana Code section 34-11-2-11; therefore, Emmert failed to bring its action against Kennedy in a timely maimer. However, I must dissent with respect to the majority’s resolution of Emmert’s es-toppel claim.
[18] On appeal, Emmert insists that even if the eighteen-month federal statute of limitations applies — as this court holds that it does, its claim should not have been dismissed because Kennedy should be estopped from asserting…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tatum C. Singletary v. Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Robert Bomba and Annamarie P. Bomba v. W. L. Belvidere, Inc., a General Partner Doing Business as Candlewick Lakes Associates, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. KimeDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2014