Legal Opinion

Oster v. Rubinstein

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 29, 1955PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDELSTEIN, District Judge.

This is a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b) (1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., on the ground of the absence of diversity of citizenship. The action was commenced against Serge Rubinstein and, after his death, his executors were substituted in his place, under Rule 25(a) (1). It is not questioned that there is a complete diversity of citizenship between the present plaintiffs and the present defendants which would support an original suit. However, it is argued that the complaint is jurisdictionally defective in its averment of alienage; that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Mollan v. TorranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. Hackner v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  4. Clarke v. MathewsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  5. James Conolly and Others v. Richard Taylor and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1829

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Oster v. RubinsteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  2. Adair v. Amerus Leasing, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API