Legal Opinion

Carr v. Grand Canyon University Incorporated

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided November 5, 2019No. 2:19-cv-05214Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Eileen Carr, et al., No. CV-19-05214-PHX-MTL 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 Grand Canyon University Incorporated, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiffs and putative class members Eileen Carr, Samuel Stanton, Jane Doe I, Jane 16 Doe II, and Jane Doe III have filed a Motion to Recuse Pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 144

and 28

17 U.S.C. § 455

(the “Motion”). (Doc. 13.) The Court denies the Motion as it pertains to 28 18 U.S.C. § 455. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 144, the Court refers the remaining recusal issues to 19 another…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. HollandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. Richard R. SiblaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. Stephen Yagman v. Republic Insurance Cna Insurance Valley Forge InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. Terry Lynn Nichols v. Wayne E. Alley, District Judge, United States of America, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API