Legal Opinion

Winn v. Hibbs

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided March 25, 2005No. CIV. 00-0287-PHXEHCPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CARROLL, District Judge.

Intervenor-Defendant Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization (ACSTO) filed a Motion to Intervene [Dk. 64], which is unopposed. Defendants Arizona School Choice Trust, Glenn Dennard, and Luis Moscoso (collectively “ASCT”) filed a Motion to Dismiss [Dk. 71]. Defendant Hibbs filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Dk. 72]. ACSTO filed a Motion to Dismiss [Dk. 73]. Plaintiffs responded to the Motions to Dismiss and Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. 1 ASCT replied. 2 Defendant Hibbs replied [Dk. 77].

Procedural History

This case was filed on February 15,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Widmar v. VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. NyquistSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Hibbs v. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Mueller v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Winn v. Arizona Christian School Tuition OrganizationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Winn v. Arizona Christian School Tuition OrganizationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Winn v. GarriottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API