Wrenn v. Sheriff, Clark County
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The appellant was charged with open murder in violation of NRS 200.010. After a preliminary examination he was bound over to the district court for trial. His petition for a writ of habeas corpus was denied, and he appeals.
The principal contention of the appellant is that the evidence at the preliminary examination was insufficient to show that a first degree murder had been committed because there was no direct proof of malice aforethought, and thus the evidence adduced was less than sufficient to constitute probable cause to hold the appellant on an open murder charge. We reject that…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. FuchsNevada Supreme Court · 1962
- Goldsmith v. Sheriff of Lyon CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. OschoaNevada Supreme Court · 1926
- Miner v. LambNevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Nicholson v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- Hunter v. District Ct. in & for Twentieth Jud. Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- Sheriff, Clark County v. BadilloNevada Supreme Court · 1979
- Sheriff v. PotterNevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Sheriff, Clark County v. WilloughbyNevada Supreme Court · 1981
- Hulse v. SheriffNevada Supreme Court · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.