Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kilpatrick v. Director, Arkansas Employment Security Department

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 11, 1996No. E 95-137Published

1DissentMelvin Mayfield, Judge

I dissent from the majority decision in this case. The majority has found substantial evidence to support the decision of the Board of Review which held that appellant’s inability to work nights and weekends was a willful disregard of the employer’s best interest and was therefore misconduct. In Carraro v. Director, 54 Ark. App. 210, 924 S.W.2d 819 (1996), we explained misconduct as it has been construed in unemployment insurance cases.

Arkansas Code Annotated § ll-10-514(a)(l) (Repl. 1996) provides that an individual shall be disqualified for benefits if he is discharged from his last work…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nibco, Inc. v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
  2. Victor Industries Corp. v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
  3. Shipley Baking Co. v. StilesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Carraro v. Director, Employment Security DivisionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Sadler v. StilesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API