Legal Opinion

Meinholz v. Meinholz

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 29, 1984No. 84-52Published

1Opinion of the Court

678 S.W.2d 348 (1984)

283 Ark. 509

Judith Lynn MEINHOLZ, Appellant,

v.

Ludwig Hugo MEINHOLZ, Appellee.

No. 84-52.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

October 29, 1984.

E. Winston McInnis, Little Rock, for appellant.

Carl J. Madsen, P.A., Stuttgart, for appellee.

HOLLINGSWORTH, Justice.

P.A. Hollingsworth, Justice. This is a divorce case. Once again the Court must interpret our statute governing the division of property in divorce cases. Ark.Stat. Ann. § 34-1214 (Supp.1983). The basic question here is whether we recognize the appellee's "enhanced business career" as marital property under our present statute.

When…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Day v. DaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Inman v. InmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979
  3. Kikkert v. KikkertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  4. Gentry v. GentrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  5. Meinholz v. MeinholzSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API