Meinholz v. Meinholz
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
678 S.W.2d 348 (1984)
283 Ark. 509
Judith Lynn MEINHOLZ, Appellant,
v.
Ludwig Hugo MEINHOLZ, Appellee.
No. 84-52.
Supreme Court of Arkansas.
October 29, 1984.
E. Winston McInnis, Little Rock, for appellant.
Carl J. Madsen, P.A., Stuttgart, for appellee.
HOLLINGSWORTH, Justice.
P.A. Hollingsworth, Justice. This is a divorce case. Once again the Court must interpret our statute governing the division of property in divorce cases. Ark.Stat. Ann. § 34-1214 (Supp.1983). The basic question here is whether we recognize the appellee's "enhanced business career" as marital property under our present statute.
When…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Day v. DaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Inman v. InmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979
- Kikkert v. KikkertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Gentry v. GentrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Meinholz v. MeinholzSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.