Walter A. Wood Co. v. Eubanks
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
On Petition to Superintend and Revise, in Matter of Raw, Proceedings of the District Court of the United States for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. This is a petition to superintend and revise in a matter of law the proceedings of the court in bankruptcy for the Western district of North Carolina.
Read the full summary
On Petition to Superintend and Revise, in Matter of Raw, Proceedings of the District Court of the United States for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. This is a petition to superintend and revise in a matter of law the proceedings of the court in bankruptcy for the Western district of North Carolina. On October 16, 1906, a contract was made between the Walter A. Wood Company and the Implement & Supply Company by Which certain goods of the former were sold and delivered to the latter. As a part of said contract, the Implement & Supply Company made the following agreement:…
1Opinion of the CourtPritchard, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). To properly determine the questions involved in the controversy now before us, it becomes necessary to ascertain the nature of the contract between the Walter A. Wood Company and the Implement & Supply Company. This contract being in writing, free from ambiguity and plain in its terms, it is purely a question-of law as to its interpretation. Hence this case comes before us on a petition to superintend and revise in matters of law the proceedings of the District Court! The referee found the following facts and conclusions of law:
“(1) That the Walter A. Wood…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- York Manufacturing Co. v. CassellSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Thompson v. FairbanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Hewit v. Berlin MacHine WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Humphrey v. TatmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Dooley v. PeaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- American Service Co. v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Mach. Co. v. VanstoryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1909
- In re United States Lumber Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1913
- In re Mason-Curley-Brady, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1928
- Corbitt Buggy Co. v. RicaudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.