Legal Opinion

Lucas v. Huff

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Yernon Circuit Court. — Hon. II. 0. Timmonds, Judge. Piled brief on merits. Piled brief on merits.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, P. J.

This is an action to recover one hundred dollars, but whether it was commenced before a justice of the peace or in the circuit court, the abstract nowhere informs us. It might have been brought in either of these courts.

The abstract of the record proper consists of the petition or statement of the cause of action alone. It contains no answer, nor does it show that any such pleading was or was not filed in the cause. Nor is any mention therein made of any judgment, though we may infer from what purports to be a bill of exceptions that there was a judgment in the cause for the defendant. Nor…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hill v. CombsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Danforth v. Lindell Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  3. Lawson v. MillsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  4. Walser v. WearSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  5. Butler County v. GraddySupreme Court of Missouri · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Diamond Rubber Co. v. WernickeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. School District No. 1 v. BoyleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Walner v. WadeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Armstrong v. DunnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Schmelzer v. Carnie-Goudie Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API