Legal Opinion
State of Nevada v. Floyd Hicks
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 24, 2000No. 96-17315PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
196 F.3d 1020 (9th Cir. 1999)
STATE OF NEVADA; WILLIAM MOLINI; NEVADA DIVISION OF WILDLIFE; MICHAEL C. PENCER, RICH ELLINGTON, and BILL FITZMORRIS, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
FLOYD HICKS; TRIBAL COURT in and for THE PAIUTE-SHOSHONE TRIBES; HONORABLE JOSEPH VAN WALRAVEN, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 96-17315
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Argued and Submitted October 7, 1997
Withdrawn from Submission Oct. 10, 1997
Resubmitted November 4, 1999
Decided November 9, 1999
As Amended January 24, 2000
[Copyrighted Material Omitted]
C. Wayne Howle, Deputy Attorney General, Carson City, Nevada, for the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- National Farmers Union Insurance v. Crow Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Williams-Willis v. Carmel Financial Corp.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2001
- Bank One, N.A. v. LewisDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2001
- Ford Motor Co. v. TodecheeneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005