Legal Opinion

City of Pompano Beach v. Bardua

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 15, 1984No. 84-233PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOWNEY, Judge.

This is a timely appeal from a final order denying the appellants’ “Amended Complaint for Rule to Show Cause and Final Order of Forfeiture” and ordering that the subject matter of the litigation, a 1975 Mercedes 450 SL, be returned to the appellee. The Amended Complaint for Rule to Show Cause was dismissed for failure to establish probable cause that the vehicle was used as an instrumentality or to facilitate the commission of a felony, or that it was used to transport contraband.

We believe a reversal of the order is required because the ultimate decision was premature, no doubt…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re App. 48,900 Dollars in US CurrencyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. In re the Forfeiture of United States Currency in the Amount of Five Thousand Three Hundred DollarsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Department of Law Enf. v. Real PropertySupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. Florida Department of Law Enforcement v. LazzaraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. In re Forfeiture of the Following Described Property Six Video Draw Poker MachinesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API