Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Lange

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1991No. 90-884PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon a careful review of the record, we agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Respondent is therefore publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 1-102(A)(4) and 7-102(A)(5). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Sweeney, Douglas, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Holmes and Wright, JJ., dissent.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. CoxOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. LangeOhio Supreme Court · 1995