Legal Opinion
Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Lange
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided January 9, 1991No. 90-884PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
Upon a careful review of the record, we agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Respondent is therefore publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 1-102(A)(4) and 7-102(A)(5). Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Sweeney, Douglas, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Holmes and Wright, JJ., dissent.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. CoxOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. LangeOhio Supreme Court · 1995