Legal Opinion
Roman Catholic Diocese of Newark v. Ho-Ho-Kus Borough
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided May 23, 1966PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
47 N.J. 211 (1966)
220 A.2d 97
ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF NEWARK, A RELIGIOUS CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ET AL, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
BOROUGH OF HO-HO-KUS, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE COUNTY OF BERGEN AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND CHARLES A. BELTRAMINI AND ELEANOR K. BELTRAMINI, HIS WIFE, ET AL, DEFENDANTS-INTERVENORS-APPELLANTS, AND JOHN A. BYREM AND ELEANOR P. BYREM, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS-INTERVENORS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued February 7, 1966.
Decided May 23, 1966.
Mr. Samuel M. Lyon, Jr., argued the cause for appellant Borough of Ho-Ho-Kus; Mr.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Archbishop O'Hara's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Gruber v. Mayor and Tp. Committee of Raritan Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Vickers v. Tp. Committee of Gloucester Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- School District v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- DeSimone v. Greater Englewood Housing Corp. No. 1Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970