Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance v. Polk County

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 14, 2009No. 2D08-3377PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ALTENBERND, Judge.

Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (Fidelity) appeal a judgment declaring that Fidelity, and not Florida Mutual Insurance Trust (FMIT), is the workers’ compensation carrier responsible for paying benefits for an occupational disease suffered by an employee of Polk County. We conclude that the trial court erred because it did not apply the provisions of section 440.151(5), Florida Statutes (1999), 1 that clearly make FMIT responsible for this claim.

I. The Workers’ Compensation Claim

Zola Ann Ross worked as a registered nurse…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zurich Insurance Co. v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987
  2. University Park Care Center v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Edmonds Indus. Coatings, Inc. v. LolleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  4. Sunshine Truck Plaza/Camp Oil Co. v. TuckerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Eastern Airlines, Inc. v. CrittendenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State of Louisiana v. Robert Wayne LegerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API