Legal Opinion

Bistricer v. Chin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 8, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Standards of Appeals of the City of New York, dated December 8, 1998, which, after a hearing, granted the application for a zoning variance of a nonparty whose property adjoins that of the petitioner, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), dated April 30, 1999, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that judgment is affirmed, with costs.

It is a “well-established rule that local zoning boards have discretion in considering applications…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fuhst v. FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Frishman v. SchmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Richard Dudyshyn Contracting Co. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Mount PleasantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Epstein v. Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carlino v. ScheyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API