Legal Opinion

Manimal Land Co. v. RANDALL E. STOFFT

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 22, 2004No. 4D03-4906, 4D04-289, 4D04-1596PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

889 So.2d 974 (2004)

MANIMAL LAND COMPANY, Appellant,

v.

RANDALL E. STOFFT ARCHITECTS, P.A., Appellee.

Nos. 4D03-4906, 4D04-289, 4D04-1596.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

December 22, 2004.

Thomas D. Lardin of Thomas D. Lardin, P.A., Delray Beach, for appellant.

Jack R. Reiter, Peter M. Feaman & Joelle C. Sharman of Adorno & Ross, P.A., Miami, for appellee.

2Per curiam

We affirm the trial court's finding that the defendant did not breach its duty to design a building for appellant plaintiff, as it is supported by competent substantial evidence. We address only the defendant's cross-appeal…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Finkelstein v. North Broward Hosp. Dist.Supreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Fisher v. John Carter and Associates, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  3. Lyn v. LynDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clampitt v. BrittsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  2. Jaye v. Royal Saxon, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  3. Jackson v. AnthonyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API