Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Baker
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This court concurs with the board that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(6). We also agree that respondent willfully failed to file his 1987 tax return and that our precedent in such cases requires a one-year suspension from the practice of law. Further, the testimony offered in mitigation is insufficient to warrant a lesser sanction, particularly when the record shows that respondent’s disability ended with his return to work in 1987. According*305ly, we order that respondent be suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of one year. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Disciplinary Counsel v. GreeneOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. AllisonOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Toledo Bar Assn. v. AboodOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. LazzaroOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. VenezianoOhio Supreme Court · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.