Columbus Bank & Trust Co. v. Jones
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
The court did not err in overruling the general demurrer. Petitions setting up a case of virtual adoption upon somewhat similar facts have been discussed in a number of cases decided by this court. The rights of petitioner under the facts alleged were discussed at length in Crawford v. Wilson, 139 Ga. 765 (78 S. E. 30, 44 L. R. A. (N. S.) 773). In that case it was said in part: “The authorities very generally establish the proposition that a parol obligation by a person to adopt the child of another as his own, accompanied by a virtual though' not a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Crawford v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Copelan v. MonfortSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Wynn & Robinson v. TynerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
3Cited by9 opinions
- Toler v. GoodinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Savannah Bank & Trust Co. v. WolffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Rieves v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- First National Bank v. HoldernessSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Pierce v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.