Johnson & Johnston Associates Inc. v. R.E. Service Co., Inc. And Mark Frater
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Concurrence
RADER, Circuit Judge, with whom MAYER, Chief Judge, joins,
concurring.
While endorsing the results and reasoning of the court, I would offer an alternative reasoning. This alternative would also help reconcile the preeminent notice function of patent claims with the protective function of the doctrine of equivalents. This reconciling principle is simple: the doctrine of equivalents does not capture subject matter that the patent drafter reasonably could have foreseen during the application process and included in the claims. This principle enhances the notice function of claims by making them…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Scimed Life Systems, Inc. v. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Sage Products, Inc. v. Devon Industries, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Pennwalt Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.