State v. Stukes
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hearn
Melvin P. Stukes appeals his conviction for criminal sexual conduct (CSC) and first degree burglary, arguing the court of appeals erred in affirming the trial court’s jury instruction that Victim’s testimony need not be corroborated by additional *496evidence or testimony pursuant to Section 16-3-657 of the South Carolina Code (2003).1 We reverse and hold instructing the jury on this statute is an impermissible charge on the facts and therefore unconstitutional. We further overrule our precedent condoning this instruction.
FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On the evening of May 10, 2004, Victim arrived…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ludy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. SchumpertSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- State v. CrookCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Gaxiola v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. LeonardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. CartwrightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
- State v. DeverCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
- Chad Willard v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017
- People of Guam v. Derick James SimmonsSupreme Court of Guam · 2025
- Fredrick Eugene Bliss a/k/a Fredrick E. Bliss a/k/a Fredrick Bliss a/k/a Frederick Eugene Bliss v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2021
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.