Legal Opinion

Scott v. United States. Jones v. United States. Johnson v. United States. Bayne v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 10, 1952No. 11432, 11433, 11434 and 11435PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Per curiam

When appellants were first brought to trial on the indictment involved here, the court, sua sponte, declared a mistrial. Upon the retrial which is under review here, appellants claimed that the first trial constituted former jeopardy and moved to be discharged. The trial judge denied this motion, and the correctness of his ruling is the sole issue presented by this appeal.

Briefly, these are the circumstances which are said to constitute former jeopardy. At the first trial appellants Scott, Jones and Johnson, hereinafter referred to as the three appellants, were represented by one counsel.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. United States v. Joseph A. Chase, United States of America v. Robert H. Parrish, United States of America v. Wyatt J. Roy, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  2. United States v. Albert GoldsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  3. United States Ex Rel. Joseph Russo v. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Passaic CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  4. State v. FarmerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
  5. State v. TolliverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API