Legal Opinion

David & Ann Marie Niemela v. United States

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 11, 1993No. 92-2192UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

995 F.2d 1061

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases.

David & Ann Marie NIEMELA, Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant, Appellee.

No. 92-2192.

United States Court of Appeals,

First Circuit.

June 11, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts

David W. Niemela and Ann Marie Niemela on brief pro se.

A. John Pappalardo, United States Attorney, James A. Bruton, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Gary R. Allen, David I. Pincus, and Jordan L. Glickstein, Attorneys, Tax Division,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. John G. Rocovich, Jr. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  2. Hughes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Michael Pagano v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Edward M. ZollaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Louie N. Elias v. W.H. ConnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. BerkDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
  2. Kyick Holdings, LLC v. BessentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API