Reiss Steamship Co. v. United States Steel Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CONNELL, District Judge.
This case has been presented to this Court upon a motion by the libelant requesting interest be awarded upon a decree in Admiralty holding that both parties were equally at fault. See Reiss Steamship Co. v. United States Steel Corp., 374 F.2d 142 (6 Cir. 1967). The libelant requests that interest be awarded at a rate, within the discretion of the Court, from the date of payment of invoices pertaining to repairs to both vessels, and from the date of the collision with respect to the loss of use sustained by libelant. On the other hand, respondent…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- The WrightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- O'DOnnell Transp. Co., Inc. v. City of New York. The Kosciusko. The Don. The Anna F. O'DOnnellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- The ManitobaSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Kawasaki Zosensho of Kobe, Japan v. Cosulich Societa Triestina Di Navigazione of Trieste, ItalyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1926
- American Union Transport Co., Inc. (Of New York), and v. Aguadilla Terminal, Inc., LibelantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- The Reiss Steamship Company, Libelant & Cross-Respondent-Appellee v. United States Steel Corporation, and Cross-Libelant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- 12 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1191, 11 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,880 Eligh Watkins, Individually and on Behalf of Other Persons Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. Scott Paper Company, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976