Legal Opinion

Flagstar Bank, FSB v. Reinhold

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 2010No. 2010-0508Published

1Opinion of the Court

Hamilton App. No. C-090166. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Entry filed March 3, 2010:

“Under R.C. 2305.09(D), does a cause of action for professional negligence accrue on the date that the negligent act is committed, or on the date that the negligent act causes actual damages?”

The conflict eases are JP Morgan Chase Bank NA v. Lanning, Stark App. No. 2007CA00223, 2008-Ohio-893; Fritz v. Brunner Cox, L.L.P., 142 Ohio App.3d 664, 756 N.E.2d 740; and Gray v. Estate of Barry,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gray v. Estate of BarryOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Fritz v. Bruner Cox, L.L.P.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Jp Morgan Chase Bank v. Lanning, 2007ca00223 (3-3-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API