Legal Opinion

Berthold v. Hoskins

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Mississippi

Decided May 27, 1889PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity. On final hearing. Bill by Berthold & Jennings against Isaac W. Hoskins and others, to get aside conveyances.

1Opinion of the Court

Hill, J.. This cause is submitted upon bill, answers, and proof, from which the following facts appear: On the 5th day of February, 1887, said I. W. Hoskins and wife executed a mortgage upon the real estate described in the bill, which then belonged to said I. W. Hoskins, to secure the payment of three notes executed by him to complainants. After the maturity of the notes, complainants, in the chancery court of Lincoln county, filed their bill against said Hoskins and wife to foreclose the mortgage, for the payment of the amount due on the mortgage notes, which resulted in their obtaining a…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cowell v. City Water Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  2. Pike v. RichardsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Cowell v. City Water-Supply Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API