Legal Opinion
Ex parte Cahan
District Court, S.D. California
Decided July 2, 1930No. 9938PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCORMICK, District Judge.
It is considered unnecessary to review in detail the facts of this proceeding. Suffice it to say that the alien Cahan petitions for his release through the writ of habeas corpus from an order of deportation issued against him by the Secretary of Labor, after appropriate hearings before the immigration officers and the Secretary of Labor. It was found by the immigration authorities that the petitioning alien had unlawfully entered the United States at San Ysidro, Cal., on or about May 1, 1929, in violation of the Immigration Act of February 5, 1917 (8 USCA § 155), and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ng Fung Ho v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States Ex Rel. Bilokumsky v. TodSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Ghiggeri v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- Chan Wong v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- Plane v. CarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ranieri v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
- United States v. Chan Nom GeeDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1931
- F-S-CBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1958