Legal Opinion

Cullinan v. Federal Union Surety Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1906Published

Actioh upon a bond.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

In the case of Cullinan v. Burkard, 93 App. Div. 31, 86 N. Y. Supp. 1003, in an action upon a similar bond, the court decided that the action was upon a contract obligation, and not one to recover a penalty or forfeiture impressed by statute. The plaintiff is, therefore, entitled to recover costs of the action by force of provision of section 3228, subdivision 4, of the Code of Civil Procedure. The affidavits presented to the clerk on presentation of witnesses’ fees and disbursements were sufficient to justify his taxation of such disbursements. I know of no reason why plaintiff . should not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cullinan v. BurkardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  2. Lyman v. Young Men's Cosmopolitan ClubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  3. Lyman v. Young Men's Cosmopolitan ClubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API