Legal Opinion
Villescas v. Richardson
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided April 16, 2001No. CIV. A. 97-B-1955PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Carlos Villescas moves for attorney fees and expenses. Defendant Bill Richardson, Secretary of the Department of Energy (“DOE”), opposes the motion. The motion is adequately briefed and oral argument would not materially aid its determination. For the following reasons, I grant Plaintiffs motion.
I. Attorney Fees under the ADEA
On December 12, 2000, I entered judgment in Plaintiffs favor in the amount of $50,000.00 plus costs and attorney fees for his claim of retaliation in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Robinson v. City of EdmondCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Ricky Houston v. Allen Reich, Harold Dean McHam the Excise Board of Choctaw County, Oklahoma, and the City of Hugo, OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. O & G Spring and Wire Forms Specialty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Newmark v. PrincipiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Newmark v. PrincipiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Marinelli v. PotterDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009