Legal Opinion

Armstrong Furniture Co. v. L. Lecompte & Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided July 1, 1884No. 163Published

1Opinion

On the Merits.

The facts of this case are fully stated in the opinion of this court in the motion to dismiss. Defendants in their brief upon the merits do not attack the finding of the court a quo relative to the nature of the transfer to Fendez. They content themselves with simply demanding the dissolution of the attachment and a denial of the privilege. The language of said brief is as follows; — “the only question which the appellant seeks to bring to the attention of the court is whether or not the attachment, with the privilege attending it, should have been mantained.

We have mentioned…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Loeb v. ArentSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
  2. Hartwell v. Alabama Gold Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
  3. State ex rel. Le Conte v. Judge Fourth District CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API