Legal Opinion
City & County Savings Bank v. M. Kramer & Sons, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 6, 1964PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarold E. Koreman, J.
The third-party defendants, McKenna Construction Corporation (hereinafter called McKenna) and Albany Gravel Co. Inc. (hereinafter called Gravel Co.) move, under 3211 (subd. [a], par. 5) of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, to dismiss the third-party actions brought against them on the ground that the same are barred by the Statute of Limitations. In addition, Stants Combustion Associates, Inc. (hereinafter called Stants), a third-party defendant in a separate action, moves for leave to amend its answer to plead the Statute of Limitations, and upon such amendment also moves for dismissal of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Sheila-Lynn, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1945
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Sheila-Lynn, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mims Crane Service, Inc. v. Insley Mfg. Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Smith v. GalioNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- Thomas G. Caruloff v. Emerson Radio & Phonograph Corporation, and Third-Party v. Standard Kollsman Industries, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Perez v. Chutick & SudakoffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Ibach v. Grant Donaldson Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.