Legal Opinion

State v. Carmickle

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 21, 1989No. 10-87-09897; CA A47853PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(4). He contends that the court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence that was obtained after an unlawful stop. We affirm.

Two police officers stopped the van in which defendant was a passenger, because another passenger matched the description of a man wanted on an out-of-state warrant for murder. The wanted individual had a tattoo of a star near his eye. The stop was at night, and there were four adults in the van. The officers asked each of the persons for identification and, using portable…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. DempsterOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. State v. RayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. State v. RayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. State v. AngerbauerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API