Legal Opinion · Dissent

Esselman v. Job Service North Dakota

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1996No. Civil 960006Published

1DissentMeschke, Justice

I respectfully dissent. In my opinion, the Referee’s findings, conclusions, and decisions in these cases are reasonable, while the contradictory findings and decisions by the Executive Director of Job Service, said to be “conducted on the basis of the information contained in the record,” are unreasonable and unexplained.

A person is disqualified for unemployment compensation benefits if she has left her employment “voluntarily without good cause attributable to the employer.” NDCC 52-06-02(1). In several situations, however, this specific disqualification “does not apply.” Id. Two of those…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Heifetz v. Dept. of Business RegulationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Schultz v. North Dakota Department of Human ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Newland v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Hammond v. North Dakota State Personnel BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Medcenter One, Inc. v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API