Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Kane v. McKechnie

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 12, 1976No. 662 Miscellaneous DocketPublished

1DissentPomeroy, Justice

The majority concludes that Section 414 of the Administrative Code of 1929, Act of April 9, 1929, P.L. 177, Art. IV, 71 P.S. § 124, is unconstitutional because, under its terms, a private group is delegated the legislative power to make appointments to a governmental board. Of course, an Act of the General Assembly is presumed to be constitutional and will not be struck down unless it clearly, palpably and plainly violates the Constitution.1 Because I cannot agree that Section 414 is constitutionally objectionable under this standard, I must dissent.

In my view, the majority’s reliance on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Daly v. HemphillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Chartiers Valley Joint Schools v. Allegheny County Board of School DirectorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. State Board of Chiropractic Examiners v. Life FellowshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Hetherington v. McHALESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Absentee Ballots CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API