Schomp v. Averette
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
SHORES, Justice.
Stephan Hale Schomp sued the members of the Coffee County Commission as a result of an automobile accident that occurred on the public roads of Coffee County. Schomp appeals from a summary judgment.
There was no evidence before the trial court, when the defendants’ motion of summary judgment was granted, from which the trier of fact could reasonably conclude that the defendant, the Coffee County Commission had a duty to maintain the intersection of Alabama Highway 27 and County Road 1146. The defendant produced evidence, which was not disputed, that on May 28, 1988, the date of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Perry v. Mobile CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Harris v. MacOn CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
3Cited by2 opinions
- Udy v. Custer CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
- Udy v. Custer CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2001