Legal Opinion

Rio Grande E. P. R. Co. v. Kinkel

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 15, 1913PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court, El Paso County; A. M. Walthall, Judge. Action by C. A. Kinkel and wife against the Rio Grande & El Paso Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Appellees instituted this suit February 26, 1908, in trespass to try title to parts of the Mundy Heights addition to the city of El Paso, Tex., claiming same by three, five, and ten years statute of limitation. Defendant Rio Grande El Paso Railroad Company answered by plea of not guilty, and specially that title to said land was in the El Paso Canal Company. Plaintiffs recovered judgment, from which this appeal is taken.

Because the assignments of error as filed in the trial court do not make any reference to the motion for new trial, as required by rule 25 of this court (142 S.W. xii), they…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. KimballTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HudsonTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Wilson v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Watkins v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. SpeightsTexas Supreme Court · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Needham v. CooneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. WilcoxonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Ruth v. CobeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Hollan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Leatherwood v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API