Legal Opinion

Cantigny Trust v. Department of Revenue

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 30, 1988No. 2-87-0963Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

171 Ill. App.3d 1082 (1988)

526 N.E.2d 518

CANTIGNY TRUST, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 2-87-0963.

Illinois Appellate Court — Second District.

Opinion filed June 30, 1988.

Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General, of Springfield (Shawn W. Denney and Robert J. Ruiz, Solicitors General, and Bret A. Rappaport, Assistant Attorney General, of Chicago, of counsel), for appellant.

Edward G. Proctor and Thomas F. Ging, both of Isham, Lincoln & Beale, of Chicago, for appellee.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

2Opinion of the Court · DunnJustice Dunn

Defendant, the Department of Revenue (Department), appeals…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Methodist Old Peoples Home v. KorzenIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  2. McKenzie v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  3. People ex rel. Pearsall v. Catholic BishopIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  4. MacMurray College v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Fairview Haven v. Department of RevenueAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API