Legal Opinion

International Proteins Corp. v. Ralston-Purina Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1988No. C-6078PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RAY, Justice.

The issue in this appeal is whether a defendant, who settles with the plaintiff and takes an assignment of the plaintiff’s cause of action, may prosecute the plaintiff’s original claims against the remaining defendants. The court of appeals held that under such an arrangement the settling defendant could pursue the original claims in the plaintiff’s name. 722 S.W.2d 431. The effect is that a settling defendant may preserve contribution rights against non-settling defendants if the settling party takes an assignment of the plaintiff’s cause of action. This is contrary to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Beech Aircraft Corp. v. JinkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Ralston Purina Co. v. Barkley Feed & Seed Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. GandyTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. PPG Industries, Inc. v. JMB/Houston Centers Partners Ltd. PartnershipTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Fairfield Insurance Co. v. Stephens Martin Paving, LPTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Claude Cimino v. Raymark Industries, Inc., Pittsburgh Corning Corporation and Asbestos Corporation LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  5. Insurance Co. of North America v. Security Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API