Legal Opinion

Blanchard v. . Western Union Tel. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 1875PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The judgment at Special Term is well vindicated and sustained, by the very satisfactory dissenting opinion of Judge BOCKES, in the Supreme Court. His review of the evidence and statement of the law leaves but little, if any thing, that need be said in favor of a reversal of the order granting a new trial, and affirming the original judgment for the plaintiffs. The rights of the plaintiffs and the defendant to the occupation and use of the Hudson river, for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Albany Bridge CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  2. People v. VanderbiltNew York Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. State ex rel. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
  2. People Ex Rel. Danziger v. Protestant Episcopal House of MercyNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Viebahn v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  4. Greenwood v. Town of WestportDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1894
  5. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. M/V Cape FearCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API